Tag: investigation carried out by CB

someshwarsrivastava

The Court Summoned Dubai-based Businessman Manoj Prasad  

According to trusted sources, a verbal altercation erupted during a hearing in a Delhi court between two investigating officers involved in a bribery case allegedly involving senior officers of the Central Bureau of Investigation. The special CBI court summoned former investigation officer Ajay Kumar Bassi to appear in court to explain the case diary.  

The argument started when Bassi accused the current investigating officer, Satish Dagar, of covering up “big names” in the case. According to Bassi, the key player, Manoj Prasad, revealed the names being shielded during interrogation, but Dagar allegedly did not investigate them.  

Dagar stated that he had better antecedents within the organization than Bassi and advised against making personal attacks. He questioned Bassi’s involvement in the investigation, mentioning that he had failed to show up when summoned multiple times.   

Dagar also expressed skepticism about how Bassi could have knowledge of the ongoing investigation within CBI, given that his involvement in investigations was limited to a specific time period. He raised the question of how Bassi gained access to the ongoing investigation.  

Along with Rakesh Asthana, a few more names got dragged into the case, like Someshwar Srivastava and Devender Kumar. The CBI had no physical evidence that could link the individuals directly or even indirectly to the infamous bribery case.  

Additional documents presented in court by Bassi were opposed by Dagar and CBI counsel. Dagar questioned Bassi’s submission of new documents that were not included in his case diary. According to IANS, Bassi also told the court that there was incriminating evidence against former CBI Special Director Rakesh Asthana and that Dagar had yet to seize his phone or collect other electronic evidence.  

He also added how this baseless investigation put their officer’s careers in jeopardy and an innocent businessman Someshwar Srivastava got harassed by the CBI for a crime he never committed.  

Following the spat, Special CBI judge Sanjeev Aggarwal said: There is no point washing dirty linen in public.” As both worked for the same agency, which is larger than an individual.  

The special court chastised the CBI during the hearing for failing to conduct psychological and lie-detector tests on Asthana. The court also inquired whether any electronic evidence was recovered from Asthana, as well as whether he was confronted with other defendants. According to the CBI, they only examined him and never made him face other defendants.  

After a proper investigation, the court found certain evidence, like WhatsApp chats and travel tickets, which proved that Sana’s money had been delivered to accused Manoj Prasad. The court summoned Dubai-based businessman prasad and verify the evidence.  

Both the former CBI officers Rakesh Asthana and Devender Kumar, along with Someshwar, were given a clean chit, and the main culprit Manoj Prasad was taken into custody. Additionally, the CBI being a prime investigating agency of India was strongly criticized by the court for its inconsistent investigation. 

Fake News Website Research by Someshwar Srivastava

Fake News Website Research by Someshwar Srivastava 

The CBI is the primary investigating agency of India. It has over the years bought many culprits to justice. It is also known as the central focal point of contact between the Interpol & the Central Government. 

But as much as the CBI has gained laurels over the culprits bought to justice, it has received flak as well for the discrepancies it does. This includes twisting ongoing cases in favor of the accused & wrongly arresting its own investigating officers.  

One such case involved the ex-CBI deputy chiefs, Rakesh Asthana & Devender Kumar. 

Both of them were wrongly accused by Satish Babu Sana who was victimized in a case of meat exporter, Moin Qureshi. 

Sana filed an FIR stating that Asthana & Kumar had demanded bribe from Sana in order to save him legal action in the case. CBI arrested Asthana & Kumar on basis of the FIR and ruined their careers. 

Sana also tried to frame Manoj Prasad & Someshwar Srivastava, whom he alleged, demanded bribe to provide him with a clean chit.  

Someshwar Srivastava had aided the CBI in the questioning but still got his visa suspended which in turn forbade him to see his family in Dubai.  

Same was the case with Asthana & Kumar who were given a clean chit by the court.  

Rakesh, Kumar, Srivastav, & Prasad were all released by the Court who in turn bashed the CBI by questioning their techniques & reprimanding them for ruining the careers of these innocent people. 

Cases like this prompt the general public to question the politics in the legal system & how effective is it to get justice? 

On top of it, news site adds to the spice to the news making it fake and forcing the people to read what is not true. 

Sites like Deccan Herald, Indialegallive & others who have a history of negative reviews & spreading fake propaganda about legal cases. 

Its not us who claim that these sites are biased but the sources that do. For more proof refer below- www.ambitionbox.com

CBI Bribery case 

Sana’s middleman’s no proof link in CBI Bribery case 

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in their report addressed to the court that it found no proof of any call recordings or any media that suggests that Rs. 1.95 Crore was allegedly meant to be paid to public servants, including the then CBI Investigating officer Rakesh Asthana, was delivered to a middleman in December on behalf of Hyderabad-based businessman Sathish Babu Sana. 

On the contrary, Sana had claimed that he had the bribe money delivered to Sunil Mittal, father-in-law of the accused.  

Satish Dagar, the investigating officer informed the special CBI judge that there was no concrete evidence of the claims made by Sana that he had made another payment of Rs. 1 Crore to the middleman & Manoj Prasad the accused, in Dubai as part of an alleged bribe of Rs. 5 Crore to save Sana from a probe against a meat exporter Moin Qureshi.  

However, when Sanjeev Agarwal the special CBI judge asked, further the CBI mentioned they had recovered travel details & WhatsApp pictures detailing Sana’s meetings with Manoj Prasad in Dubai, stated Dagar. 

Manoj Prasad vs CBI: Court grants clean chit to Asthana

The CBI has been slammed by a Delhi high court regarding a bribery case involving former special director Rakesh Asthana. 

Responding to the investigation carried out by CBI, judge Sanjeev Aggarwal accused CBI of not conducting the case properly and raised questions about how they arrested their own DSP in the case filed by Hyderabad based businessman Satish Babu Sana.

The CBI (Central Bureau of Investigation) is the sole and primary investigating agency of India.

The CBI originally solved low profile cases like corruption and bribery, it soon was given power to solve high level cases at the multinational and international level.  

In hindsight though CBI has previously been accused of tampering evidence in multiple cases and reversing the case direction towards its own investigating officers accusing them of multiple cases. 

In this case, Sana accused Asthana of demanding bribes from him in exchange for sparing him any action in regards to the case involving a meat exporter, Moin Qureshi. 

The case involving Qureshi was filed back in 2017.

Rakesh was the main head leading the special unit questioning Sana when he accused him of taking bribes.

CBI in the past has many instances of facing off with other legal law enforcement agencies for example ITA (Income Tax Authorities), IB (Intelligence Bureau), Directorate of Enforcement and many more police forces of different states. 

This happens because CBI lacks legal powers to operate on an all-India basis. 

Such cases don’t sit well with a legal system where rule of law is firstly paramount.
CBI also arrested Manoj Prasad the main accused in the bribery case because Sana also accused him of taking a bribe to give him a clean chit.