Tag: CBI bribery case

CBI Bribery Scandal

CBI Bribery Scandal: Exploring the Riddle of Consequences – Someshwar Srivastava

Introduction 
In a world that yearns for transparency, integrity, and ethical governance, bribery remains a corrosive force that erodes the foundations of trust and fairness. One of the most glaring examples of this is the controversial CBI bribery scandal that has shaken the very core of justice and governance.  

This article delves into the intricate layers of bribery, using the CBI scandal as a lens through which we explore its far-reaching implications on institutions, society, and the collective moral compass. 

Bribery: The Web of Deceit 
Bribery, often lurking in the shadows, is an act that involves offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting something of value with the intention of influencing a person’s actions or decisions in power.  

The CBI bribery scandal thrusts this unethical practice into the spotlight, revealing how the allure of quick gains can lead individuals down a treacherous path. 

The CBI Bribery Scandal Unveiled 
At the heart of the storm lies the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), an institution entrusted with upholding justice and maintaining the rule of law.  

The scandal centres on allegations of bribery to manipulate investigations and decisions within the CBI. These allegations involve individuals even as reputed as Someshwar Srivastava, who had faced an old bribery case.
 
This revelation has not only cast doubts on the agency’s credibility but also raises questions about the very fabric of democracy it is meant to safeguard. 

The Cost of Betraying Trust 
In the allure of financial gain, those embroiled in the CBI bribery scandal overlooked the true cost of their actions. What appeared to be lucrative deals ultimately resulted in the squandering of vast resources that could have been better utilized for the nation’s development and societal upliftment.  

The aftermath is a trail of financial penalties and legal fees, eclipsing any immediate monetary gains from bribery. 

Temporal Toll: The Strain of Time 
Time, a resource once spent, cannot be reclaimed. The intricate web of deceit spun around the scandal has consumed considerable time, diverting it away from legitimate pursuits. 
 
The legal battles and bureaucratic complexities have stretched on, eroding public confidence not only in the accused but also in the agency’s ability to deliver timely justice. The scarcer justice becomes, the more the social fabric frays. 

Tarnished Reputations and Eroded Trust 
The aftermath of the CBI bribery scandal is a stain that blots the reputation not just of those directly involved, but also of the entire organization and the institution it represents.  

Trust in the agency has been shaken, casting a long shadow that extends beyond the CBI itself. Citizens’ faith in democratic governance takes a hit, fostering disillusionment and eroding the foundations of a just society. 

Ripple Effects: Society at Stake 
The tentacles of bribery reach far beyond the immediate individuals implicated; they wrap around society, leaving lasting scars. The unequal distribution of resources facilitated by corruption exacerbates existing social inequalities, marginalizing the already vulnerable communities further.  

The CBI scandal serves as a stark reminder of how bribery perpetuates injustice, compromising societal well-being. 

Furthermore, as the case continues to unravel, the rule of law itself is strained. Institutions that are meant to uphold and protect citizens become ineffective, eroding governance and creating an environment conducive to lawlessness. 

A Call for Collective Responsibility 
Preventing the recurrence of such scandals demands a united effort. Strengthening legal frameworks, fostering transparent processes, and nurturing a culture of ethical conduct are pivotal steps.  

Whistleblower protection mechanisms must be fortified to encourage individuals to come forward with information about corrupt practices without the fear of retaliation. 
Education plays a crucial role in countering bribery. By instilling strong moral values from an early age, individuals are better equipped to make ethical decisions when confronted with challenging situations. 

Businesses to have a role to play by establishing stringent codes of conduct and internal mechanisms to monitor and report unethical behaviour. 

Conclusion 
The CBI bribery case starkly warns that bribery’s fleeting allure conceals its dangerous consequences. The wastage of resources, erosion of trust, and the societal aftermath highlight the urgency of a value system that prioritizes integrity above all else. 
 
In an era where ethical conduct and transparency are increasingly non-negotiable, the CBI scandal, associated with Someshwar Srivastava, beckons us to introspect. The scandal is both a cautionary tale and a rallying cry, urging us to resist the temptation of bribery for the greater good of society. 

Exploring the Psychological Impact of Bribery Cases on Individuals

Exploring the Psychological Impact of Bribery Cases on Individuals – Someshwar Srivastava

In a world fraught with ethical dilemmas and complex legal issues, bribery cases stand as a stark reminder of the darker side of human behaviour. Beyond the legal ramifications and financial consequences, the psychological impact of bribery cases on the individuals involved can be profound and far-reaching.  

This article delves into the intricate interplay between bribery cases and mental health, shedding light on the emotional toll that these situations can exact from both the perpetrators and victims. 

The Weight of Guilt and Shame 

For individuals implicated in bribery cases, feelings of guilt and shame can be overwhelming. Engaging in unethical behaviour can create a cognitive dissonance where one’s actions contradict their personal values and moral compass.  

This inner conflict can lead to a downward spiral of negative emotions, contributing to anxiety, depression, and even post-traumatic stress disorder. Guilt, a powerful emotion, arises from the recognition of wrongdoing. The knowledge that one’s actions have harmed others or violated societal norms can be emotionally debilitating. 

Those caught in the web of bribery often experience an internal struggle, torn between the pursuit of personal gain and the awareness of the harm inflicted on others.  

On the other hand, feeling ashamed is the result of one’s conduct. Public exposure and media coverage of bribery cases intensify these feelings, as individuals become subject to societal judgment and scorn.  

The shame associated with being labelled as a “corrupt” individual can lead to isolation and a profound erosion of self-esteem. 

Anxiety and Fear of Consequences 

Bribery cases often lead to legal proceedings, investigations, and potential jail time. The looming uncertainty of legal outcomes can be a significant source of anxiety for individuals involved.  

The fear of losing one’s freedom, reputation, and livelihood can create chronic stress, manifesting as insomnia, panic attacks, and other anxiety-related symptoms.  The anticipation of being exposed and facing the legal consequences of bribery can create a constant state of hyper-vigilance.  

Every knock on the door or phone call can trigger a rush of anxiety, as individuals worry about the next step in the legal process. The unrelenting stress can impair cognitive function and decision-making abilities, perpetuating a cycle of anxiety and impaired judgment. 

Impact on Relationships and Social Isolation 

Bribery cases often have a ripple effect that extends to an individual’s personal and professional relationships. Family members, friends, and colleagues may distance themselves due to fear of association with the scandal. The resultant social isolation can intensify feelings of loneliness and exacerbate the emotional toll.  

Professionally, individuals implicated in bribery cases might face exclusion and distrust within their workplace, as seen in the case of Someshwar Srivastava. A severe sense of alienation and identity loss can result from feeling like a criminal in the working world.  

The erosion of social support networks can hinder coping mechanisms and contribute to a downward spiral in mental health. 

Coping Strategies and Support Systems 

Navigating the psychological impact of bribery cases necessitates the implementation of effective coping strategies and the cultivation of robust support systems. Professional mental health assistance, such as therapy and counselling, can provide individuals with a safe space to explore their emotions and develop healthy coping mechanisms. 

Support from loved ones and peers who are empathetic and non-judgmental is crucial. Rebuilding trust and fostering open communication within personal relationships can aid in the healing process. Peer support groups specifically designed for individuals facing similar challenges can provide a sense of belonging and a platform to share experiences. 

Rebuilding and Healing 

Recovery from the psychological aftermath of bribery cases is a gradual process that requires time, patience, and resilience. It involves introspection, taking responsibility for one’s actions, and making amends where possible.  

Engaging in acts of restitution can contribute to a sense of closure and alleviate some of the emotional burden. Rebuilding one’s life and reputation necessitates a commitment to personal growth and ethical transformation.  

This journey towards self-redemption is characterized by humility, self-awareness, and a dedication to living in alignment with one’s newfound values. 

Conclusion 

The psychological impact of bribery cases on individuals, such as Someshwar Srivastava, is a complex and multi-faceted issue that goes beyond the legal realm. The emotions of guilt, shame, anxiety, and social isolation can have far-reaching effects on mental health and well-being.  

Acknowledging and addressing these psychological challenges is essential for individuals to embark on a path of healing and restoration. As society continues to grapple with ethical dilemmas and moral choices, it is imperative that we recognize and support individuals like Someshwar Srivastava, who have been affected by the psychological aftermath of bribery cases. 

CBI Procedure

Bribery in India: CBI’s Role and Legal Procedures 

Bribery is a widespread issue in India, and it often undermines the country’s economic and political stability. To combat this problem, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) plays a crucial role in investigating and prosecuting bribery cases in the country. 

The procedure of bribery cases in India starts with the lodging of a First Information Report (FIR) with the local police. If the case involves corruption at a national level, the CBI takes over the investigation. The CBI has the power to arrest, search, and seize property in connection with its investigations. 

Once the CBI has completed its investigation, it files a chargesheet in court. If the charges are proven, the accused may be sentenced to imprisonment, fines, or both. The punishment for bribery in India is severe, with a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. 

For Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) who are involved in bribery cases in India, it is essential to seek legal advice as soon as possible. NRIs should contact a lawyer in India who has experience in handling bribery cases. The lawyer can provide guidance on the legal proceedings and represent the NRI in court if necessary. 

An example of a high-profile bribery case involving an NRI is the 2G spectrum scam. In this case, several NRIs were accused of bribing government officials to obtain licenses for telecommunication spectrum at low prices. The CBI investigated the case and filed charges against the accused. The case was widely reported in the media and led to significant public outrage, highlighting the need for stricter enforcement of anti-bribery laws in India. 

However, despite the efforts of the CBI and other agencies, bribery remains a persistent issue in India. To effectively combat this problem, it is important to address its root causes, such as weak institutions, lack of transparency, and ineffective governance. This can be done through the implementation of strong anti-bribery laws and regulations, as well as by promoting transparency and accountability in government and business operations. 

In conclusion,  

Bribery is a serious issue in India that threatens the country’s economic and political stability. The CBI plays an important role in investigating and prosecuting bribery cases, but to effectively combat this problem, it is necessary to address its root causes and implement stronger anti-bribery measures. NRIs involved in bribery cases in India should seek legal advice as soon as possible to protect their rights and interests. 

No Evidence to Support the High-Profile Bribery Case Against Asthana

No Evidence to Support the High-Profile Bribery Case Against Asthana

The High-Profile Bribery case gets a new angle as the court confronts CBI. Earlier, the Hyderabad-based businessman Sathish Babu Sana accused public servants, including the special director of the CBI, Rakesh Asthana, and former deputy Devendra Kumar, of taking bribes. 

As the case progressed, two more names came to the spotlight Manoj Prasad and Someshwar Srivastava. Sana claimed to deliver crores to Prasad and Srivastava to save himself from Moin Qureshi, a Controversial meat exporter. 

Sana also made several more claims, like how he had arranged Rs 1 crore from his friend Yahya Abraham in Dubai and also linked Prasad and Srivastava as Brothers. But no hard evidence was found to support the claims made by Sana. 

The case got some new twists and turns as it was thoroughly analyzed by the Delhi High court. At first, judge Sanjeev Aggarwal questioned CBI regarding accusing their own DSP without any proper investigation. The credibility of the prime investigation authority was questioned by the court. 

After a re-investigation performed by the CBI as ordered by the court no new evidence was found against the former CBI deputy directors Devendra Kumar and Rakesh Asthana. Further, the court blamed CBI for ruining the life of honest officers. 

Rakesh Asthana and Devendra Kumar got a clean chit from the court, and Judge Sanjeev Aggarwal also release other innocents as no proof was found. 

CBI did a great job of catching Manoj Prasad, the real culprit, who was pulling all the strings using CBI Deputies as shields. WhatsApp pictures and flight details establish a clean meeting between Sana and Manoj Prasad in Dubai. 

The case got a significant spotlight from the Media houses, and many names involved still getting a backlash from the public. The case is a live example of how an improper investigation can ruin people’s life, defame public authorities, and question legal system. 

Rakesh Asthana Bribery Case

 Rakesh Asthana Bribery Case: Power Vs Public Faceoff 

CBI (Central Bureau of Investigation) is one of the most legitimate agencies in India. Dealing with bribery case, corruption, and multi-state cases. The agency operates both nationally and internationally.  

On several occasions, the CBI has been charged with corruption and the manipulation of evidence for money and fame. One such case was Alok Verma’s bribery case, in which they frame their own officer.  

Verma was immediately suspended by the CBI and charged with bribery without a proper investigation. The Rakesh Asthana bribery case was yet another example where the CBI again accused one of their officers of accepting bribes.  

The charges were that Asthana took money from Satish Babu Sana to release him in the case of meat exporter Moin Qureshi.   

Similarly, an innocent businessman, Someshwar Srivastava, was caught in the crossfire. It wasn’t the first time the CBI had dragged innocent people into high-profile cases without proper investigation.   

The media also played an important role in supporting illegal practices conducted by CBI. They made up stories about the case against Asthana and Someshwar. Many biased media sites like the Deccan Herald have completely misrepresented the news to gain revenue and viewership.  

Meanwhile, the court collected 10,000 rupees from the involved, Someshwar Srivastava and Manoj Prasad. As the case progressed, the court found that the CBI investigation was inconsistent.  

The CBI was criticized and the court ordered CBI to a proper investigation. New evidence surfaced as the case was closely investigated. Wrongly accused Someshwar Srivastava and former CBI officers Rakesh Asthana and Alok Verma get bail.  

The real culprit Manoj Prasad was arrested and imprisoned. Former CBI officers were reappointed as chiefs of the police force.  

Real problems like hunger, unemployment, and illiteracy continue to engulf our economy. Yet these powerful bodies continue to corrupt our society like parasites. We hope in the future these powerful organizations stop manipulating and harassing the general public and bring positive change.  

Rakesh Asthana Bribery Case

Rakesh Asthana Bribery Case: A Grand Conspiracy to Inculpate CBI

CBI also known as the Central Bureau of Investigation is India’s leading investigative agency. Over the years, the CBI has solved many cases and brought many criminals to justice.  

However, the CBI has tried many times to prevent the evidence and turn the case in favor of the accused. In doing so, they typically arrest their own investigators on charges based on the FIR filed by the accused. 

One such case is the case of Rakesh Asthana the ex-investigating officer of the CBI.  

Asthana was investigating the case of a Hyderabad-based businessman, Satish Babu Sana who was involved in a case of meat exporter Moin Qureshi. Asthana was then the deputy superintendent of CBI during the case. 

Babu filed an FIR against Rakesh for demanding bribes to clear his name from the meat exporter case. In turn, Asthana had alleged that CBI Director Alok Verma had falsely attempted to set a trap for him and charged Verma with corruption. 

This news was a hit in the media and some websites published fake news about Rakesh Asthana portraying him as the villain. In fact, the court rebuked the CBI for arresting Asthana, as there was no evidence of involvement in the bribery charges from Astana. 

Indian Legal a verified news site recently published news on a similar case claiming that the court charged 10,000/- per accused Manoj Prasad & Someshwar Srivastav involved in the bribery case, which is totally a baseless.  

The whole Rakesh Asthana bribery case is just a made-up conspiracy to take down Indian legal system and generate social unrest within the society.  

Deccan herald yet another news website publishes multiple articles to defame CBI, Police, Someshwar Srivastav, Alok Verma and Rakesh Asthana, to fulfill the same agenda.  

While in reality justice was served by the court. In the meantime, prime accused Manoj Prasad was captured by the Police while Rakesh Asthana, Alok Verma, and Someshwar Srivastav were given a clean chit by the high court. 

This isn’t the first time these sites have published fake news to fulfill personal agendas. There are many articles claiming that these are scam sites and generate fake messages on various topics. 

Penalty Save You from a Bribery Case

Can ₹ 10,000 Penalty Save You from a Bribery Case – Know the Truth!! 

Corruption has been feeding on our economy and society for a long time now. The corrupt culture has found its way to crawl deep inside every organizational and social model. Even if we don’t want, we are becoming part of the corruption one way or the other. 

With time corruption has evolved into a major criminal activity, bribery being its core practice. Also, to fight and control this crime, the government issued several laws, penalties, and punishments. Although the punishments for bribery vary from nation to nation. 

In India, bribery is a serious criminal act that falls under Section 171E in The Indian Penal Code. It states that Whoever commits the offense of bribery shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or, with a fine, or with both. 

Now, to get a better picture of bribery cases, let’s try to understand them with a case study. The Manoj Prasad bribery case is probably one of the many high-profile cases that raise serious questions against the government on maintaining law and order. 

Multiple police and CBI head officer’s name get dragged into the dirt. What’s to be noted is that the court penalized the accused, Manoj Prasad, with 10,000 rupees for the involvement. What it means is the penalty for bribery can be lakhs or even crores depending on the type and intensity of the case. 

Also, high-profile cases like the Raveen Roy bribery case and the Mehta fraud case where a large amount of cash had been altered through corruption. Punishments like life imprisonment and a penalty up to three times the bribe amount are paid.  

Every year we hear and read about thousands of bribery cases, what’s important is we analyze, learn and try to make a difference. Say no to Corruption!! 

someshwarsrivastava

Someshwar Srivastava – Terms to Know before Investing in Real-Estate

Real estate can be a great long-term investment, but it’s not for everyone. To make the most of your real estate investments and avoid costly mistakes, it’s important to understand key terms like ROI and leverage. This blog is a compilation of 5 basic terms as quoted by Someshwar Srivastava a renowned property investor and blogger. 

Let’s jump into the blog to know about these crucial terms in detail which will allow you to make good investments in the real-estate business. 

Return on Investment (ROI) 
ROI is important because it tells you how much profit you’re making on your investment. To calculate ROI, divide the total gain by the total cost. So, if you bought a property for 100,000/- and sold it six months later for 110,000/- your ROI would be (110/100) * 100 = 10%. 

The advantage of using ROI is that it can help measure performance against other investments in the same field over time so that investors know whether they are doing better or worse than average under certain circumstances. If these properties underperformed compared to others with similar characteristics, then this might indicate something was wrong with them such as poor maintenance or location issues which would require remedial action before moving forward with further purchases. 

Equity 
Equity is the difference between what a property is worth and what you owe, or the amount of money you would have if you sold your property. A positive equity is when your equity is greater than zero; in other words, when your home has a higher market value than what you owe. This can happen when homeowners have paid off some of their mortgages or have built up positive cash flow on their properties.  

In contrast, negative equity means that the homeowner owes more on his/her mortgage than his/her home’s current market value—if this happens to be true for an investor who buys an investment property and hopes to sell it at some point as part of an exit strategy like Airbnb or short-term vacation rentals (STVRs). 

Cash flow 
Cash flow is a simple concept: it’s the amount of money that a property generates. If you’ve ever had to pay rent for an apartment, you know how important cash flow can be. 

Cash flow is the difference between revenue and expenses—it’s positive when revenue exceeds expenses, which sounds like a good thing! When you’re working with real estate investing and mortgages, however, negative cash flow means that your monthly payments (mostly interest) outweigh your monthly income from rent in that property. You still have to make payments on this property even though it isn’t producing any profit for you (yet). 

You need to understand how cash flow works before making any big decisions or investments in real estate. 

Leverage 
Leverage is the amount of money you borrow to buy a property. The higher your leverage, the more risk you are taking with your investment. In many cases, this can be beneficial as it allows you to make larger purchases without having to come up with all of the cash upfronts. 

For example: let’s say that you want to buy a 400k property but don’t have enough cash on hand for the purchase price. Instead of waiting until you’ve saved enough money from working and living off of savings alone, leveraging enables it you to use other people’s money (the bank or investors) so that he/she can make larger investments sooner rather than later—without sacrificing any equity in return! 

Appreciation 
Appreciation is the increase in value of an asset over time. It’s the difference between what you paid for the property and what it is worth today. Appreciation can be good, if not great, way to make money if your investment property appreciates over time. 

If you purchase a house at 300k (and remember that every market is different), and two years later it sells at 400k, then there was an appreciation of 20%. This means that your original investment returned 100% after 2 years (due to no maintenance costs). 

Conclusion 
There are many other terms and concepts that may be helpful to know as well, but these are the ones that we think are most important. We hope you’ve enjoyed our list of five important property business terms, and that it helps answer any questions about investing in real estate! 

Someshwar Srivastava

Innocents Accused Wrongly Arrested by CBI 

CBI has been reprimanded by the Delhi Court for arresting its own officer Rakesh Asthana & ruining his career. Asthana was arrested on charges of bribery on the basis of an FIR by businessman Satish Sana. 

Sana was involved in a case of Moin Qureshi & was being interrogated by Rakesh Asthana. 

He alleged he sent bribes to accused Manoj Prasad, the primary suspect in the bribery case to help him save face in the CBI case.  

Moreover, he also alleged that Asthana had demanded a bribe from him to spare him any legal action in the case.  

CBI Director Alok Verma had Asthana arrested & ruined his career. Asthana too accused Alok of corruption & later was granted a clean chit from the court. 

Another innocent that was wrongly accused was Someshwar Srivastav who even after cooperating with the CBI was not allowed to visit his family. 

The media has made false claims on this issue accusing Someshwar Srivastav & Rakesh Asthana & not mentioning the main accused Manoj Prasad, degrading their status further. 

One such site is Deccan Herald who in the past has had instances of providing fake news & claims & hiding the real facts.  

The 2 sites below are proof that Deccan Herald is not a genuine source but is Anti-nationalist, gives fake claims in national sports & is Left-center biased due to lack of genuine reporting sources. 

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/deccan-herald/
https://www.consumercomplaints.in/deccan-herald-b100139
scroll.in

False News Posted by Scroll.in- Know The Truth 

Media has always been a major force in driving the news to the public. Media has evolved from print to digital media.  

Yet there are many sites who spread false news about many cases.  

One such site is scroll.in. There have many sites claiming that scroll publishes fake news about certain high-profile criminal cases.  

One such case involving Rakesh Asthana has been brought in bad light. 

Rakesh Asthana was the ex-deputy superintendent of the Central Bureau of Investigation. CBI is the primary investigating agency of India. It is also known as the POC for contact with Interpol. 

Rakesh was the investigating officer in the case involving a Hyderabad businessman, Satish Babu Sana. Satish was involved in a case of a meat exporter Moin Qureshi. 

Sana filed a FIR & alleged that Rakesh had demanded a bribe from him to spare any legal action in the case. 

CBI arrested Asthana as per the FIR lodged by Sana. 

Asthana had also alleged that Alok Verma, then the Superintendent, had framed him for corruption & accused him of the same charge. 

The high court ruling had, however, given a clean chit to Asthana and cleared him of all charges.  

Scroll published false news framing Rakesh Asthana & Someshwar Srivastava in false cases downgrading their image.  

We collected sources from Change.org, opindia.com, hindupost.in & stophinduhate.org that have claimed that scroll is a fake news site & every news posted on it is completely false and opposite to reality. 

News Resource –

=>https://www.change.org/p/ministry-of-information-and-broadcasting-ministry-of-home-affairs-ajit-doval-action-against-undisclosed-funding-of-scroll-in-and-block-its-accessibility-in-india
=>https://www.opindia.com/2020/09/scroll-fake-news-fact-check-health-cards-sensitive-information/
=>https://hindupost.in/media/independent-news-media-why-scroll-in-deserves-your-scrutiny/
=>https://stophinduhate.org/hindu-haters-2/media/scroll-in/